ULM Game Thread
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:45 pm
- x 45
- x 13
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:38 pm
- x 481
- x 41
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:25 pm
- x 16
- Contact:
Re: ULM Game Thread
Zero offensive touchdowns on the day folks against ULM…that is your new offense folks
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:38 pm
- x 481
- x 41
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:04 pm
- x 145
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 10:22 pm
- x 33
- x 12
- Contact:
Re: ULM Game Thread
Well, Monken has definitely shown P-5 schools he can run something other than Triple Option. He’s also shown them a meltdown over the last 4 possessions for the ages.
1 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:38 pm
- x 481
- x 41
- Contact:
Re: ULM Game Thread
ULM should just take a knee and kick the field goal. Why risk the fumble? It is our only hope of scoring.
0 x
21-17!
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 539
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 1:25 pm
- x 16
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 932
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 11:58 am
- x 3
- x 42
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 2433
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 1:38 pm
- x 481
- x 41
- Contact:
Re: ULM Game Thread
ULM should just run it again. We have a better chance of a blocked kick score than driving 90+ yards.
0 x
21-17!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: apgarme, ArmyBN82, Armyfaninpa, armyhockeyfan, Google [Bot], LoneStarPhan, Majestic-12 [Bot], neumanna1, PrideandDream, RABBLE, Semrush [Bot], sirmashie, stash76, thedoc85, westcoastarmyfan and 187 guests