What to think of our D?

Discussing Army Black Knights football, basketball and more. United States Military Academy sports forum. West Point athletics discussion board.
gabn92
Warrior
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:11 pm
x 2
x 105
Contact:

What to think of our D?

Post by gabn92 »

They’ve played pretty good…until they give up the big play. Is it nitpicking or a troubling trend? Wondering how correctable that is for the D or is it a sign that better teams are going to be able to really do some damage?
0 x
WrekDivr
Warrior
Posts: 2505
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:04 pm
x 145
Contact:

Re: What to think of our D?

Post by WrekDivr »

I think we are challenged to stop a good offense. UTSA ran for about 12 yards on their first two plays (including the fumble). They averaged 5.5 yards per carry. To stop them, we had to stunt, blitz and take other risks. Sometimes it works - shy sack for example - and sometimes you get burned. We got burned a few times on Friday and had some successes as well.

If we don’t take risks on D, we don’t stop anyone (well maybe DSU). I fully support taking those risks, but would like find a way to be successful more often. It would have helped to get 2-3 sacks on Friday instead of just one (though you gotta love the timing).
0 x
User avatar
kfan12
Warrior
Posts: 872
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:33 am
x 2
x 56
Contact:

Re: What to think of our D?

Post by kfan12 »

WrekDivr wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:56 pm I think we are challenged to stop a good offense. UTSA ran for about 12 yards on their first two plays (including the fumble). They averaged 5.5 yards per carry. To stop them, we had to stunt, blitz and take other risks. Sometimes it works - shy sack for example - and sometimes you get burned. We got burned a few times on Friday and had some successes as well.

If we don’t take risks on D, we don’t stop anyone (well maybe DSU). I fully support taking those risks, but would like find a way to be successful more often. It would have helped to get 2-3 sacks on Friday instead of just one (though you gotta love the timing).
Well, it would seem you need a safety to have any hope of tackling a receiver who gets past the D-line if you are going to blitz...I'm all for the blitz, but someone has to be back.
0 x
BG
User avatar
ARMORMAN
Warrior
Posts: 758
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 7:00 am
x 2
x 130
Contact:

Re: What to think of our D?

Post by ARMORMAN »

I'm afraid we're seeing the effects of Marquel Broughton's departure. He covered a helluva lot of ground and seemed to always back up our first line of defense... Was hoping that Hammond would mostly fill those shoes, and perhaps he will over time....
0 x
gabn92
Warrior
Posts: 980
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:11 pm
x 2
x 105
Contact:

Re: What to think of our D?

Post by gabn92 »

Our D is going to be tested against Syracuse. We’ve always seemed to struggle with mobile QBs, and from the scouting reports it sounds like that’s the Syracuse QB…195 rushing yards and I think 4 TDs against Purdue! Ouch.

Red zone efficiency and turnovers look to be a potential opportunity for Army D to exploit. We will see…but hoping we can eliminate the broken plays for TDs we’ve seen thus far; force a couple of turnovers and bend but don’t break by holding them to more FGs than TDs. Do that and play a perfect game from the O and Army has a chance.

Fingers crossed!
0 x
Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ArmyBN82, Armyfaninpa, Bing [Bot], DoubleNuts, Dude69, Google [Bot], jgish92, LoneStarPhan, Majestic-12 [Bot], neumanna1, Oliphant, RABBLE, Semrush [Bot], sirmashie, stash76 and 200 guests