AAC
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 981
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:11 pm
- x 2
- x 107
- Contact:
Re: AAC
Our home slate hasn't been that exciting for years. Assuming 8 conference games plus CIC games, that leaves 2 games for flex: an FCS and a P5. With teams like Syracuse, BC, WF, Vanderbilt...we can get a home-home series so we can still see a P5 time game at Michie about as often as we are seeing them these days.
I wish we could stay independent as well, but the landscape of college football has changed too much. This move was inevitable. The AAC gives us a chance at being competitive.
Wish we'd get over the A/N game "needing" to be at the end of the season and just move it to the last game of the season for each team and play it the week before the conference title game. Like every other rivalry game in the country during "rivalry weekend". The TV folks I'm sure can figure out how to schedule the games and give national exposure to the game...it doesn't have to be the only game on that weekend for people to watch.
I wish we could stay independent as well, but the landscape of college football has changed too much. This move was inevitable. The AAC gives us a chance at being competitive.
Wish we'd get over the A/N game "needing" to be at the end of the season and just move it to the last game of the season for each team and play it the week before the conference title game. Like every other rivalry game in the country during "rivalry weekend". The TV folks I'm sure can figure out how to schedule the games and give national exposure to the game...it doesn't have to be the only game on that weekend for people to watch.
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 1654
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:49 pm
- x 108
- Contact:
Re: AAC
I can't remember a home slate that was "exciting" in 30+ years. When I was a cadet we had years were we played home games versus colgate, VMI and Lafayette in the same year.
But at least independence allows variety. We are going to be playing the same darn teams, year after year, forever. AAC sucks
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:39 am
- x 7
- Contact:
Re: AAC
From a competitive stand point, AAC is a good fit. UTSA is
currently tied for 1st place in the conference at 3-0.
Over the next 3 years, the only team coming to WP
that will draw a crowd is Syracuse. The rest of the schedule
is Mac, Sun Belt and AAC teams. The teams we have
been playing for years. Joining the AAC or not, the
schedule is still the same quality level.
Mike Buddie knows the history of Army football, and
I would like to think going forward he must see
the issue's with not being in a conference.
currently tied for 1st place in the conference at 3-0.
Over the next 3 years, the only team coming to WP
that will draw a crowd is Syracuse. The rest of the schedule
is Mac, Sun Belt and AAC teams. The teams we have
been playing for years. Joining the AAC or not, the
schedule is still the same quality level.
Mike Buddie knows the history of Army football, and
I would like to think going forward he must see
the issue's with not being in a conference.
1 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2019 11:58 am
- x 3
- x 49
- Contact:
Re: AAC
I agree. Best part about being independent is mixing upwpgrad wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 12:26 pmI can't remember a home slate that was "exciting" in 30+ years. When I was a cadet we had years were we played home games versus colgate, VMI and Lafayette in the same year.
But at least independence allows variety. We are going to be playing the same darn teams, year after year, forever. AAC sucks
Opponents and getting the chance to play some blue chips schools
Can’t wait to play charlotte every year
Does the prospect of being an AAC champ really excite anyone? Also going to be great when we have a great year and have a dog fight in the championship the week before navy, while they get 2-3 weeks to prepare for us.
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:11 pm
- x 3
- x 17
- Contact:
Re: AAC
I know that many people do not understand or care, but this move was absolutely necessary for financial reasons and to try to draw people to Michie. Attendance is down, year after year, and interest in West Point football is dropping. No one of any quality wants to come to West Point to play football. The payouts are not enough and they prefer to play other schools that make more sense for them. Bottom line is that Army schedule was going to get much worse in the near future, not better and that is not good. As for MONEY, Army needs the money that the AAC offers. Now, Monken, or whoever, is going to have to get better players to compete in this league. AFA does it VERY WELL in the mountain west and Navy has had some good years too. Yes, it is going to get tough, but it is the only way to go...And, BTW, no more games against the BETTER Power Five teams....play Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Duke, Wake Forest, Syracuse, BC and a few others and forget the rest....LSU taught us that we can no longer compete in that area....not even taking teams to overtime
1 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 1654
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:49 pm
- x 108
- Contact:
Re: AAC
Lets remember this is exactly what happened for us to "break the streak." In 2016, Navy played the extra game and their QB, starting slot, and I think starting LB all got injured. And then we "barely" beat them with those injuries.Dong Fong '09 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 1:10 pmI agree. Best part about being independent is mixing upwpgrad wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 12:26 pmI can't remember a home slate that was "exciting" in 30+ years. When I was a cadet we had years were we played home games versus colgate, VMI and Lafayette in the same year.
But at least independence allows variety. We are going to be playing the same darn teams, year after year, forever. AAC sucks
Opponents and getting the chance to play some blue chips schools
Can’t wait to play charlotte every year
Does the prospect of being an AAC champ really excite anyone? Also going to be great when we have a great year and have a dog fight in the championship the week before navy, while they get 2-3 weeks to prepare for us.
But, hey, we get to play charlotte each year. Maybe we can start a great rivalry with Tulsa!! And, I bet that 90% of army fans including the people on this board can't name Tulsa's mascot or 1 player who has ever played for tulsa. But, hey, good news, we are now locked in a conference with them!!! Exciting!!!
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:57 am
- x 14
- x 16
- Contact:
Re: AAC
Going back to a common offense. Joining a conference. I am expecting to hear very soon that we hired Todd Berry to be our new coach. Bad times ahead gentlemen. Bad times.
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 6:25 pm
- Contact:
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:54 am
- x 17
- Contact:
Re: AAC
I have not been in favor of a conference. I loved our ability to schedule independently. And I think we would have been able to put together a schedule every year. But AD's at every level like a lot of the work done for them already, and a conference takes a lot off their plate. But I guess in these times independents are a dinosaur. The AAC seems like a done deal, so nothing I could say would make a difference. I do also think that the AAC will be a bit watered down by 2024, so I guess as long as it seems locked up, now is not a bad time to join.
But I will say this. No more "big" games. I'm done with Michigan, Ohio State, Oklahoma, LSU, and Notre Dame for that matter. In fact, I'd like to be done with all Power 5's except maybe the regional rivalries like BC or Syracuse. We don't need strength of schedule points. No need to impress the NCAA basketball selection committee with hopes of the Big Dance in the balance. And last I checked, we don't need the guaranteed payday. Only thing those games do is guarantee a loss, and expose our kids to a higher risk of injury against teams that are superior physically and athletically.
If we are lucky enough to play those big time Power 5's in a bowl, so be it. We will deal with it then. Until then, with a conference schedule to prepare for, I want those out of conference games to be none too daunting. In the meantime, I'll take the one FCS and any of UConn, UMass, New Mexico St., Liberty, a MAC school, etc.
But I will say this. No more "big" games. I'm done with Michigan, Ohio State, Oklahoma, LSU, and Notre Dame for that matter. In fact, I'd like to be done with all Power 5's except maybe the regional rivalries like BC or Syracuse. We don't need strength of schedule points. No need to impress the NCAA basketball selection committee with hopes of the Big Dance in the balance. And last I checked, we don't need the guaranteed payday. Only thing those games do is guarantee a loss, and expose our kids to a higher risk of injury against teams that are superior physically and athletically.
If we are lucky enough to play those big time Power 5's in a bowl, so be it. We will deal with it then. Until then, with a conference schedule to prepare for, I want those out of conference games to be none too daunting. In the meantime, I'll take the one FCS and any of UConn, UMass, New Mexico St., Liberty, a MAC school, etc.
0 x
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 3Yards&Dust, ArmyBN82, Armyfaninpa, armyhockeyfan, BackinBlack97, Bing [Bot], ColdWarYushok87, dochinger28, Dong Fong '09, GOARMYSPIKES, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], kfan12, Majestic-12 [Bot], neumanna1, Oliphant, Pokey92, RABBLE, rog66, SAMMYDOG, stash76, thedoc85, tommac180, tre72ow75, usma74, Usma80, westcoastarmyfan, wp1994, WrekDivr and 313 guests