ESPN article
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 182
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2016 10:16 pm
- x 111
- x 4
- Contact:
Re: ESPN article
OK I didn't mean to start a contentious post. A few years ago I provided a link to an Athletic article on Monken. Someone asked me to post the whole article so that they wouldn't have to pay the fee. I gladly did but will refrain from doing so in the future. I really like this board, I love hearing from Army fans but now I will go into the corner and put on my dunce hat.9
0 x
- kfan12
- Warrior
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:33 am
- x 2
- x 70
- Contact:
Re: ESPN article
Be who you want to be. As implied, it is only a small theft with little likelihood of getting caught. As long as there is individual benefit without much risk, it is clearly OK. The bad guys are the ones calling it out, not the thieves or those who gain benefit. As long as the standard is the same when watching the evening news or when the theft is from those who publicly support it, at least there won't be a double standard. I'm not worked up, but I wouldn't leave my watch out around a barracks thief either.
2 x
BG
- kfan12
- Warrior
- Posts: 826
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:33 am
- x 2
- x 70
- Contact:
Re: ESPN article
They were asking for the test answers (content) because they didn't want to study (pay); it's probably not their first rodeo.westcoastarmyfan wrote: ↑Tue May 23, 2023 12:26 pm OK I didn't mean to start a contentious post. A few years ago I provided a link to an Athletic article on Monken. Someone asked me to post the whole article so that they wouldn't have to pay the fee. I gladly did but will refrain from doing so in the future. I really like this board, I love hearing from Army fans but now I will go into the corner and put on my dunce hat.9
1 x
BG
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], DoubleNuts, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], LoneStarPhan, thedoc85 and 295 guests