Defense: B+
+ responsible for 10 of our 13 pts
+ Forced 2 TOs
+ only gave up 17 pts (10 on short fields)
- Stupid, undisciplined penalty on the pick 6
- Folded down the stretch
Offense: F
- 5 turnovers
- 4 trips to the red zone = 6 pts
- 2 first and goals at the 5 and could not score
- Could not sustain drives
Special Teams: C
+ Solid punts and kickoffs
+ Blocked FG
- Missed FG
- Penalties: roughing the kicker, targeting and unsportsmanlike penalty on the kickoff.
Coaching: F
- Punting on 4th and 1
- New “o” fails to score a TD
- Horrible red zone play calling
Tonight was stunningly bad against a ULM team that is not very good.
ULM Report Card
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 322
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:20 pm
- x 10
- Contact:
ULM Report Card
2 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:11 pm
- x 2
- x 105
- Contact:
Re: ULM Report Card
Fair assessment overall.
I'd only add that playcalling overall seemed very weak, not just redzone. Unable to generate much offense at all and it seemed like we had maybe 5 or 6 plays at most. No creativity; not crisp; slow developing for most of the night. Totally ineffective.
So I guess that equates to an F- ? Not even the "high 0" DPE used to give out...definitely a "low 0" on that effort lol.
I'd only add that playcalling overall seemed very weak, not just redzone. Unable to generate much offense at all and it seemed like we had maybe 5 or 6 plays at most. No creativity; not crisp; slow developing for most of the night. Totally ineffective.
So I guess that equates to an F- ? Not even the "high 0" DPE used to give out...definitely a "low 0" on that effort lol.
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 1654
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:49 pm
- x 108
- Contact:
- RABBLE
- Warrior
- Posts: 31145
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 8:30 pm
- x 80
- Contact:
Re: ULM Report Card
[quote=wpgrad post_id=36633 time=16937
We might wind up 2-10i if we do not improve our offense.
We might wind up 2-10i if we do not improve our offense.
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2018 9:04 pm
- x 145
- Contact:
Re: ULM Report Card
Spot on. I’ll add one more:2mint wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2023 12:21 am Defense: B+
+ responsible for 10 of our 13 pts
+ Forced 2 TOs
+ only gave up 17 pts (10 on short fields)
- Stupid, undisciplined penalty on the pick 6
- Folded down the stretch
Offense: F
- 5 turnovers
- 4 trips to the red zone = 6 pts
- 2 first and goals at the 5 and could not score
- Could not sustain drives
Special Teams: C
+ Solid punts and kickoffs
+ Blocked FG
- Missed FG
- Penalties: roughing the kicker, targeting and unsportsmanlike penalty on the kickoff.
Coaching: F
- Punting on 4th and 1
- New “o” fails to score a TD
- Horrible red zone play calling
Tonight was stunningly bad against a ULM team that is not very good.
Leadership and Discipline: F
- Stupid penalties, including the jump into the end zone.
- Marshall getting in coaches face after a nice run, then later fumbling
- Turnovers, turnovers, turnovers
Too many self-inflicted wounds to win no matter what offense we were running.
0 x
-
- Warrior
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:29 pm
- x 7
- Contact:
Re: ULM Report Card
On the CBS College FP Poll, it has ULM ranked 132 out of 133 D1 teams. Hard to imagine Army will be favored in any remaining games.
0 x
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Armyfaninpa, Bing [Bot], DoubleNuts, Dude69, Google [Bot], jgish92, LoneStarPhan, Majestic-12 [Bot], neumanna1, Oliphant, RABBLE, Rowt44, Semrush [Bot], sirmashie, stash76 and 209 guests